Mark R. Manfredo
Assistant Professor
Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management
Arizona State University
Raymond M. Leuthold
T.A. Hieronymus Professor
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Abstract
Value-at-Risk, known as VaR, gives a prediction of potential portfolio
losses, with a certain level of confidence, that may be encountered over
a specified time period due to adverse price movements in the portfolio's
assets. For example, a VaR of 1 million dollars at the 95% level of confidence
implies that overall portfolio losses should not exceed 1 million dollars
more than 5% of the time over a given holding period. This research examines
the effectiveness of VaR measures, developed using alternative estimation
techniques, in predicting large losses in the cattle feeding margin. Results
show that several estimation techniques, both parametric and non-parametric,
provide well-calibrated estimates of VaR such that violations (losses exceeding
the VaR estimate) are commensurate with the desired level of confidence.
In particular, estimates developed using JP Morgan's Risk Metrics methodology
appear robust for instruments that have linear payoff structures such as
cash commodity prices.